United States v. Emmanuel Wallace, III

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 14, 2025
• Docket: 24-6677
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6677 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6677

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EMMANUEL WALLACE, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:12-cr-00017-FL-1)

Submitted: March 11, 2025 Decided: March 14, 2025

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emmanuel Wallace, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6677 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/14/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Wallace, III appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We review the district

court’s ruling on a motion for compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United States

v. Bethea, 54 F.4th 826, 831 (4th Cir. 2022). Upon review, we discern no abuse of

discretion in the district court’s determination that, under the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors, compassionate release was not warranted. See United States v. Kibble,

992 F.3d 326, 329-31 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for

evaluating compassionate release motions). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. United States v. Wallace, No. 4:12-cr-00017-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Jun. 17, 2024). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED