United States v. Emmanuel

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Emmanuel

266 F. App'x 243

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2008·No. No. 07-7237·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Shahborn Emmanuel appeals a district court order denying as frivolous his motion challenging the court’s jurisdiction to impose sentence. After reviewing the record, we find the motion is without merit and frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Shahborn Emmanuel appeals a district court order denying as frivolous his motion challenging the court’s jurisdiction to impose sentence. After reviewing the record, we find the motion is without merit and frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Emmanuel, 266 F. App'x 243 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

266 F. App'x 243 (United States v. Emmanuel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.