United States v. Emmanuel

196 F. App'x 229
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2006·No. 06-6618·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Shahborn Emmanuel, a federal inmate, appeals district court orders denying his motion for sentencing credit and denying his motion for a transcript. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Emmanuel, No. 3:97-cr-00288-ALL (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2006 & filed May 18, 2006; entered May 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Emmanuel, 196 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2006).

196 F. App'x 229 (United States v. Emmanuel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.