United States v. Emmanuel

57 F. App'x 170
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2003·No. 02-7763·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shahborn Emmanuel seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Emmanuel has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Emmanuel, Nos. CR-97-288-V; CA-00-411-3 (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 12, 2002; entered Sept. 13, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Emmanuel, 57 F. App'x 170 (4th Cir. 2003).

57 F. App'x 170 (United States v. Emmanuel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Emmanuel v. United States
541 U.S. 1036 (Supreme Court, 2004)