United States v. Emile Fort, AKA Twin Edgar Diaz, AKA Hook Robert Calloway, AKA Papa v. Emile Fort, AKA Twin Edgar Diaz, AKA Hook

478 F.3d 1099, 2007 WL 686615
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 8, 2007·No. 06-10473, 06-10478·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Judges Graber and Tallman voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Judge W. Fletcher voted to grant the petitions.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court called for a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. On such vote, a majority of the nonrecused active judges failed to vote in favor of en banc rehearing.

The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. Judge Wardlaw’s dissent from denial of en banc rehearing, and Judge Graber’s concurrence in denial of en banc rehearing, are filed concurrently herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Emile Fort, AKA Twin Edgar Diaz, AKA Hook Robert Calloway, AKA Papa v. Emile Fort, AKA Twin Edgar Diaz, AKA Hook, 478 F.3d 1099, 2007 WL 686615 (9th Cir. 2007).

478 F.3d 1099 (United States v. Emile Fort, AKA Twin Edgar Diaz, AKA Hook Robert Calloway, AKA Papa v. Emile Fort, AKA Twin Edgar Diaz, AKA Hook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Heine
314 F.R.D. 498 (D. Oregon, 2016)
State v. Lewis
327 P.3d 1042 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2014)
United States v. Salyer
271 F.R.D. 148 (E.D. California, 2010)
United States v. Barrett
496 F.3d 1079 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)