United States v. Emanuel Riggi

Third Circuit

United States v. Emanuel Riggi

256 F.2d 57, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4293

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 27, 1958·No. 12508·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our review of the record discloses that there was ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict.

We find no error in the trial court’s charge to the jury. Further, we are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury in the language set forth by the defendant in his requests Nos. 18 and 19. The substance of the requested instructions was adequately embraced in the trial court’s charge to the jury.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Our review of the record discloses that there was ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict.

We find no error in the trial court’s charge to the jury. Further, we are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury in the language set forth by the defendant in his requests Nos. 18 and 19. The substance of the requested instructions was adequately embraced in the trial court’s charge to the jury.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

United States v. Emanuel Riggi, 256 F.2d 57, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4293 (3d Cir. 1958).

Pincite

256 F.2d 57 (United States v. Emanuel Riggi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related