United States v. Emanuel Riggi

Third Circuit

United States v. Emanuel Riggi

256 F.2d 57, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4293

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 27, 1958

Docket12508

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 256 F.2d 57 (United States v. Emanuel Riggi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Emanuel Riggi, 256 F.2d 57, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4293 (3d Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our review of the record discloses that there was ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict.

We find no error in the trial court’s charge to the jury. Further, we are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury in the language set forth by the defendant in his requests Nos. 18 and 19. The substance of the requested instructions was adequately embraced in the trial court’s charge to the jury.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Our review of the record discloses that there was ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict.

We find no error in the trial court’s charge to the jury. Further, we are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury in the language set forth by the defendant in his requests Nos. 18 and 19. The substance of the requested instructions was adequately embraced in the trial court’s charge to the jury.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 F.2d 57, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-emanuel-riggi-ca3-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack