United States v. Ellis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ellis. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 F. App'x 170
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 7, 2009·No. 08-7052·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7052

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LEROY ELLIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:94-cr-70036-jlk-mfu-2; 4:08-cv-80035-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: May 20, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Leroy Ellis appeals the district court’s order denying

his petition for redress of grievances. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Ellis, Nos. 4:94-cr-70036-jlk-mfu-2; 4:08-cv-80035-jlk-mfu (W.D.

Va. June 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ellis, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Ellis (United States v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.