United States v. Ellis
This text of United States v. Ellis (United States v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7052
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LEROY ELLIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:94-cr-70036-jlk-mfu-2; 4:08-cv-80035-jlk-mfu)
Submitted: May 20, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leroy Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Leroy Ellis appeals the district court’s order denying
his petition for redress of grievances. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Ellis, Nos. 4:94-cr-70036-jlk-mfu-2; 4:08-cv-80035-jlk-mfu (W.D.
Va. June 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ellis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ellis-ca4-2009.