United States v. Edwin Murray
This text of United States v. Edwin Murray (United States v. Edwin Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7778
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EDWIN LLOYD MURRAY, a/k/a Gator,
Plaintiff - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00309-MJG-2)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edwin Lloyd Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Edwin Lloyd Murray appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for a sentence reduction filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion.
See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004)
(motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the
district court”). Thus, we affirm the district court’s order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Edwin Murray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-edwin-murray-ca4-2014.