United States v. Edwards

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Edwards. Read the opinion of the Court — 666 F.3d 877
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2009·No. 08-6866·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6866

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES RICHARD EDWARDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00099-JCC-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 4, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Richard Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Richard Edwards appeals the district court’s

order granting his motion for reduction in sentence of

imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, United

States v. Edwards, No. 1:01-cr-00099-JCC-1 (E.D. Va. May 6,

2008), and for the reasons expressed in our recent decision in

United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 253-56 (4th Cir. 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Edwards, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Edwards (United States v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)