United States v. Edwards

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 1999·No. 98-7611·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7611

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN AUSTIN EDWARDS, a/k/a Shakim, a/k/a Doquan Cooper,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-94-163, CA-98-225-2)

Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Austin Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John Austin Edwards seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998), and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Edwards, Nos. CR-94-163; CA-98-225-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Edwards, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Edwards (United States v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related