United States v. Edwards
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6050
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL A. EDWARDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-94-147-MU, CA-96-197-3-MU)
Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 30, 1997
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. United States v. Edwards, Nos. CR-94-147-MU; CA-96- 197-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Edwards (United States v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.