United States v. Edward James

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Edward James

280 F.3d 1078, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2299, 2002 WL 214961

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 2002

Docket99-1762

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 280 F.3d 1078 (United States v. Edward James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Edward James, 280 F.3d 1078, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2299, 2002 WL 214961 (6th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

AMENDED OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Upon motion by the defendant, Edward James, for a rehearing, and good cause having been shown, and upon the concession by the government that at the time of the entry of the plea of guilty by James that the government could not have adduced any additional proof on the interstate commerce element under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, as to James than it did at trial against the codefendants, Selena Turner and Kevin Larkins, our opinion of November 28, 2001, is amended to reflect that the conviction and sentence of James are REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMENDED OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Upon motion by the defendant, Edward James, for a rehearing, and good cause having been shown, and upon the concession by the government that at the time of the entry of the plea of guilty by James that the government could not have adduced any additional proof on the interstate commerce element under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, as to James than it did at trial against the codefendants, Selena Turner and Kevin Larkins, our opinion of November 28, 2001, is amended to reflect that the conviction and sentence of James are REVERSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 F.3d 1078, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2299, 2002 WL 214961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-edward-james-ca6-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack