United States v. Edward James

280 F.3d 1078, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2299, 2002 WL 214961
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2002·No. 99-1762·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

AMENDED OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Upon motion by the defendant, Edward James, for a rehearing, and good cause having been shown, and upon the concession by the government that at the time of the entry of the plea of guilty by James that the government could not have adduced any additional proof on the interstate commerce element under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, as to James than it did at trial against the codefendants, Selena Turner and Kevin Larkins, our opinion of November 28, 2001, is amended to reflect that the conviction and sentence of James are REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Edward James, 280 F.3d 1078, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2299, 2002 WL 214961 (6th Cir. 2002).

280 F.3d 1078 (United States v. Edward James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. United States
W.D. Tennessee, 2020
United States v. Tuan Luong
965 F.3d 973 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
The ON Equity Sales Co. v. Steinke
504 F. Supp. 2d 913 (C.D. California, 2007)
United States v. Greer
239 F. App'x 169 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Rosario
48 F. App'x 12 (Second Circuit, 2002)