White v. United States

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee
DecidedMarch 16, 2020
Docket1:16-cv-01094
StatusUnknown

This text of White v. United States (White v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. United States, (W.D. Tenn. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Crim. No. 02-10069-JDT VS. ) Civ. No. 16-1094-JDT ) ROCKY MORRIS WHITE, ) ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER REINSTATING ORIGINAL SENTENCE AND GRANTING MOTION TO SELF-SURRENDER

This Court granted relief to Defendant Rocky Morris White pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on the decisions in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), and United States v. Stitt, 860 F.3d 854 (6th Cir. 2017) (Stitt I). A second amended criminal judgment1 was entered on August 16, 2017, reducing White’s sentence to time served, and the United States appealed. Subsequently, in United States v. Stitt, 139 S. Ct. 399 (2018) (Stitt II), the Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Stitt I. On January 21, 2020, the Court of Appeals reversed the grant of relief under § 2255 pursuant to the Supreme Court’s opinion in Stitt II and remanded with instructions to reinstate White’s

1 White filed an initial § 2255 motion raising a claim under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Relief was granted, and he was re-sentenced to a 240-month term of imprisonment. That first amended criminal judgment was entered on March 25, 2009. original sentence. White v. United States, No. 17-5967/5969 (6th Cir. Jan. 21, 2020). The mandate has now issued. In light of the limited nature of the remand, solely for the purpose of reinstating the

original sentence, no hearing is necessary. A third amended criminal judgment will be entered in accordance with the order of the Court of Appeals, reinstating White’s prior sentence of 240 months in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons and a 3-year term of supervised release. White has moved to be allowed to self-surrender for service of his sentence at least

90 days after the date it is reinstated. Counsel for White indicates he has consulted with counsel for the United States, who has no objection to the request. Therefore, White’s motion is GRANTED. Defendant White shall surrender for service of his sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons at the date and time specified by the U.S. Marshal,

which shall be at least 90 days after entry of the third amended criminal judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ James D. Todd JAMES D. TODD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Johnson v. United States
576 U.S. 591 (Supreme Court, 2015)
United States v. Victor Stitt
860 F.3d 854 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Stitt
586 U.S. 27 (Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
White v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-united-states-tnwd-2020.