United States v. Edward Gibbs
This text of 606 F. App'x 97 (United States v. Edward Gibbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Edward Calvin Gibbs appeals the district court’s order denying Gibbs’ motion for a sentence reduction and its order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We therefore affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gibbs, No. 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-5 (E.D.Va. Dec. 2, 2014); see United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir.2010) (standard of review). Additionally, we affirm the district court’s order denying reconsideration. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir.2010) (holding district court lacks jurisdiction to reconsider prior order on § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
606 F. App'x 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-edward-gibbs-ca4-2015.