United States v. Edelkind
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Edelkind. Read the opinion of the Court — 467 F.3d 791 →
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
Nos. 05-2125, 05-2228
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
v.
JAMIE EDELKIND,
Defendant, Appellant.
ERRATA
The opinion of this court issued on October 31, 2006, is amended as follows:
On page 8, lines 12-13, replace the phrase:
"stating that 'Lehman Brothers but not Fairmont was a financial institution.'"
with the phrase:
"stating that 'Fairmont is not a financial institution but Lehman Brothers, to which it sold the note, is.'"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Edelkind, (1st Cir. 2006).
United States v. Edelkind (United States v. Edelkind) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.