United States v. Edelkind

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Edelkind. Read the opinion of the Court — 467 F.3d 791
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 11, 2006·No. 05-2125·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 05-2125, 05-2228

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JAMIE EDELKIND,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA

The opinion of this court issued on October 31, 2006, is amended as follows:

On page 8, lines 12-13, replace the phrase:

"stating that 'Lehman Brothers but not Fairmont was a financial institution.'"

with the phrase:

"stating that 'Fairmont is not a financial institution but Lehman Brothers, to which it sold the note, is.'"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Edelkind, (1st Cir. 2006).

United States v. Edelkind (United States v. Edelkind) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.