United States v. Eckles
This text of 478 F. App'x 771 (United States v. Eckles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Roxanne Kimarie Eckles appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Eckles’ motion for a transcript at government expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eckles, No. 5:05-er-00009-RLV-DCK-4 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 F. App'x 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eckles-ca4-2012.