United States v. Eastman
This text of United States v. Eastman (United States v. Eastman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v. Case No. 22-cr-22-1 (CKK/GMH) LARRY JEROME EASTMAN,
Defendant.
ORDER (October 3, 2023)
This case comes before the Court upon the receipt of a Magistrate Judge G. Michael
Harvey’s [82] Report and Recommendation dated September 8, 2023. This matter was referred
by this Court to a Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation pertaining to the
Government’s [64] Motion for an Order of Restitution, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(6).
Magistrate Judge Harvey issued his [82] Report and Recommendation after holding an evidentiary
hearing on September 5, 2023. The Report and Recommendation recommends:
that the court find by a preponderance of the evidence that the fentanyl that Defendant helped to provide the decedent caused her death and recommends that Defendant be ordered to pay the decedent’s estate, or a family member assuming the decedent’s rights, the amount of $20,625.52 in restitution for the decedent’s funeral and burial expenses, subject to the statutory requirement that compensation received from “insurance or any other source” be paid to that source (after all restitution to which the victim has been entitled is paid), 18 U.S.C. §3664(j)(1), and an offset for “any amount later recovered as compensatory damages for the same loss” in a civil proceeding, id. § 3664(j)(2).
Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 82, at 29.
No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been received
by the Court.
Accordingly, it is this 3rd day of October 2023, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED IN FULL, and it
is further
ORDERED that by October 6, 2023, the Government shall submit a proposed Order
relating to its [64] Motion for Order of Restitution. After such Order is executed by this Court, it
shall be incorporated into an Amended Judgment.
/s/ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Eastman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eastman-dcd-2023.