United States v. Earl Smith

294 F. App'x 240
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 23, 2008·No. 08-1324·Unpublished

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Earl Smith appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2) based on Amendment 706 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which reduced the base offense levels in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c) for cocaine-base offenses.

Smith pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of a mixture containing cocaine base, which subjected him to a mandatory minimum sentence of 120 months in prison. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A); U.S.S.G. § 5Gl.l(e)(2). Accordingly, Smith is not entitled to a reduction under the retroactive amendment. See United States v. Jones, 523 F.3d 881, 882 (8th Cir.2008) (per curiam). The district court’s judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

1

. The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Earl Smith, 294 F. App'x 240 (8th Cir. 2008).

294 F. App'x 240 (United States v. Earl Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jones
523 F.3d 881 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)