United States v. Dyches

451 F. App'x 287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dyches. Read the opinion of the Court — 333 F. App'x 707
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2011·No. No. 11-6776·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lennell Dyches appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion to dismiss his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Dyches, No. 8:06-cr-00136-JFA-1 (D.S.C. June 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dyches, 451 F. App'x 287 (4th Cir. 2011).

451 F. App'x 287 (United States v. Dyches) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.