United States v. Dyches

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Dyches

446 F. App'x 570

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dyches. Read the opinion of the Court — 333 F. App'x 707 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2011·No. No. 11-6649·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lennell Dyches appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion to supplement the record in his criminal matter, and his motion for stenographic notes from his criminal matter. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Dyches, No. 8:06-cr-00136-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lennell Dyches appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion to supplement the record in his criminal matter, and his motion for stenographic notes from his criminal matter. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Dyches, No. 8:06-cr-00136-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Dyches, 446 F. App'x 570 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

446 F. App'x 570 (United States v. Dyches) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.