United States v. Dyches
This text of 446 F. App'x 570 (United States v. Dyches) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lennell Dyches appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion to supplement the record in his criminal matter, and his motion for stenographic notes from his criminal matter. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Dyches, No. 8:06-cr-00136-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
446 F. App'x 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dyches-ca4-2011.