United States v. Dwight Weems
This text of 397 F. App'x 408 (United States v. Dwight Weems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Dwight Anthony Weems appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduced *409 sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Weems contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for a reduction in his sentence, which was imposed upon revocation of supervised release, because it is part of his original sentence for which the Sentencing Guidelines range has been lowered. Assuming, without deciding, that his notice of appeal is timely, see United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 936 (9th Cir.2007), Weems’ arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Morales, 590 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir.2010).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
397 F. App'x 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dwight-weems-ca9-2010.