United States v. Dwight Solomon
This text of 694 F. App'x 186 (United States v. Dwight Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dwight Leander Solomon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying.relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. On appeal, Solomon challenges only the validity of his sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2012).
To assist in our resolution of Solomon’s request for a certificate of appealability, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012), we directed the Government to file a response addressing the impact, if any, of Mathis v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016), on the continuing viability of Solomon’s North Carolina breaking and entering conviction as an ACCA predicate violent felony. In response, the Government has moved to remand the case to the district court. The Government concedes that Solomon’s ACCA enhancement is no longer valid, regardless of the status of his breaking and entering conviction, because a different predicate offense—a North Carolina conviction for possession with intent to sell cocaine—no longer qualifies as an ACCA predicate under United States v. Newbold, 791 F.3d 455, 463-64 (4th Cir. 2015).
In light of the Government’s concession and our independent review of the record, we grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court’s order denying § 2255 relief, and grant the Government’s motion to rescind the briefing order and to remand. We remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
*187 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
694 F. App'x 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dwight-solomon-ca4-2017.