United States v. Dunham

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2006·No. 06-6894·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6894

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEROY DUNHAM, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (1:95-cr-00234-BEL)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 29, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Dunham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Arcangelo Michael Tuminelli, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Leroy Dunham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp. 2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dunham,

No. 1:95-cr-00234-BEL (D. Md. Apr. 18, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dunham, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Dunham (United States v. Dunham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related