United States v. Duncan

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2004·No. 04-6050·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6050

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ORLANDO DUNCAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-86)

Submitted: April 14, 2004 Decided: April 27, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Orlando Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Duncan, No. CR-02-86

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Duncan, (4th Cir. 2004).

United States v. Duncan (United States v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.