United States v. Duncan
This text of United States v. Duncan (United States v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6050
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ORLANDO DUNCAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-86)
Submitted: April 14, 2004 Decided: April 27, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orlando Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Orlando Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Duncan, No. CR-02-86
(E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Duncan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-duncan-ca4-2004.