United States v. Duncan

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Duncan

96 F. App'x 117

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2004·No. No. 04-6050·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United, States v. Duncan, No. CR-02-86, 2002 WL 31546131 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United, States v. Duncan, No. CR-02-86, 2002 WL 31546131 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Duncan, 96 F. App'x 117 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

96 F. App'x 117 (United States v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.