United States v. Dukes

518 F. App'x 601
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 15, 2013·No. No. 12-14543·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Dwight Dukes in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dukes’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dukes, 518 F. App'x 601 (11th Cir. 2013).

518 F. App'x 601 (United States v. Dukes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parker v. Healthcare Investment Group, Inc.
272 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (N.D. Alabama, 2017)
Lage v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
145 F. Supp. 3d 1172 (S.D. Florida, 2015)