United States v. Drury

358 F.3d 1280, 2003 WL 23204861
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 3, 2004·No. No. 02-12924·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Drury, 358 F.3d 1280, 2003 WL 23204861 (11th Cir. 2004).

358 F.3d 1280 (United States v. Drury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fisher v. United States
638 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D. Massachusetts, 2009)
United States v. Carl M. Drury, Jr., M.D., Doctor
396 F.3d 1303 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Carl M. Drury, Jr.
396 F.3d 1143 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. James P. Hornaday
392 F.3d 1306 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Drury
396 F.3d 1143 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)