United States v. Druitt

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 1, 2009
Docket09-6467
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Druitt (United States v. Druitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Druitt, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6467

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO MARQUIS DRUITT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00052-sgw-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Marquis Druitt, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Antonio Marquis Druitt appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Druitt, No.

5:06-cr-00052-sgw-1 (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 18, 2009 & entered

Feb. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Druitt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-druitt-ca4-2009.