United States v. Dozier

493 F. Supp. 554, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14214
CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana
DecidedJuly 30, 1980
DocketCrim. 80-02-B
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 493 F. Supp. 554 (United States v. Dozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Dozier, 493 F. Supp. 554, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14214 (M.D. La. 1980).

Opinion

POLOZOLA, District Judge.

The defendant, Gilbert L. Dozier, has filed a motion to dismiss Count I of the indictment on the grounds that the Department of Agriculture is not an “enterprise” as defined in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq. No oral argument is required on this motion.

The Court finds that the Louisiana Department of Agriculture is an enterprise within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4). Therefore, defendant’s motion to dismiss Count I of the indictment must be denied. United States v. Bright, 78-5472 (5 Cir. July 11, 1980); United States v. Brown, 555 F.2d 407 (5 Cir.1977), certiorari denied 435 U.S. 904, 98 S.Ct. 1448, 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978); United States v. Baker, 617 F.2d 1060 (4 Cir.1980); United States v. Grzywacz, 603 F.2d 682 (7 Cir.1979); United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083 (3 Cir. 1977); United States v. Bacheler, 611 F.2d 443 (3 Cir.1979); United States v. Vignola, 464 F.Supp. 1091 (E.D.Pa.1979), aff. mem., 605 F.2d 1199 (3 Cir.1979); United States v. Altomare, 625 F.2d 5 (4. Cir. July 17, 1980); United States v. Barber, 476 F.Supp. 182 (S.D.W.Va.1979).

Therefore:

IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss Count I of'the indictment be and it is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 F. Supp. 554, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dozier-lamd-1980.