United States v. Dozier
This text of 493 F. Supp. 554 (United States v. Dozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, Gilbert L. Dozier, has filed a motion to dismiss Count I of the indictment on the grounds that the Department of Agriculture is not an “enterprise” as defined in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq. No oral argument is required on this motion.
The Court finds that the Louisiana Department of Agriculture is an enterprise within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4). Therefore, defendant’s motion to dismiss Count I of the indictment must be denied. United States v. Bright, 78-5472 (5 Cir. July 11, 1980); United States v. Brown, 555 F.2d 407 (5 Cir.1977), certiorari denied 435 U.S. 904, 98 S.Ct. 1448, 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978); United States v. Baker, 617 F.2d 1060 (4 Cir.1980); United States v. Grzywacz, 603 F.2d 682 (7 Cir.1979); United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083 (3 Cir. 1977); United States v. Bacheler, 611 F.2d 443 (3 Cir.1979); United States v. Vignola, 464 F.Supp. 1091 (E.D.Pa.1979), aff. mem., 605 F.2d 1199 (3 Cir.1979); United States v. Altomare, 625 F.2d 5 (4. Cir. July 17, 1980); United States v. Barber, 476 F.Supp. 182 (S.D.W.Va.1979).
Therefore:
IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss Count I of'the indictment be and it is hereby DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
493 F. Supp. 554, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dozier-lamd-1980.