United States v. Dowell

478 F. App'x 35
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 14, 2012
DocketNo. 12-7157
StatusPublished

This text of 478 F. App'x 35 (United States v. Dowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Dowell, 478 F. App'x 35 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Young Dowell, Jr., appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). The district court found Dowell [36]*36was not eligible for a reduction under the recent amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines because his sentence was based not on a quantity of crack cocaine, but on his career offender status. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion denying Dowell’s motion for a sentence reduction. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Anthony Goines
357 F.3d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
478 F. App'x 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dowell-ca4-2012.