United States v. Dowdy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7638
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MALCOLM DOWDY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00013-BO)
Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Dowdy, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Dowdy appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for modification of his sentence, in which he
sought an order from the district court compelling the government
to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion based on his assistance to
the government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Dowdy, No. 5:05-cr-00013-BO
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Dowdy (United States v. Dowdy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.