United States v. Dowdy

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2007·No. 06-7638·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7638

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MALCOLM DOWDY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00013-BO)

Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malcolm Dowdy, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Dowdy appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion for modification of his sentence, in which he

sought an order from the district court compelling the government

to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion based on his assistance to

the government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Dowdy, No. 5:05-cr-00013-BO

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dowdy, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Dowdy (United States v. Dowdy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.