United States v. Dowdy

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Dowdy

223 F. App'x 228

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2007·No. No. 06-7638·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Dowdy appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of his sentence, in which he sought an order from the district court compelling the government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion based on his assistance to the government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dowdy, No. 5:05-cr-00013-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Dowdy appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of his sentence, in which he sought an order from the district court compelling the government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion based on his assistance to the government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dowdy, No. 5:05-cr-00013-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Dowdy, 223 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

223 F. App'x 228 (United States v. Dowdy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.