United States v. Douglas
This text of 667 F. App'x 394 (United States v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Nigel Nicholas Douglas appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines, as well as its order denying his motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and fínd no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See United States v. Douglas, No. 2:93-cr-00131-HCM-7, 2016 WL 3681380 (E.D. Va. Jan. 8, 2016; filed Feb. 23, 2016, entered Feb. 24, 2016); see also United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 F. App'x 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-douglas-ca4-2016.