United States v. Douglas

667 F. App'x 394
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6343
StatusPublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 394 (United States v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Douglas, 667 F. App'x 394 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nigel Nicholas Douglas appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines, as well as its order denying his motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and fínd no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See United States v. Douglas, No. 2:93-cr-00131-HCM-7, 2016 WL 3681380 (E.D. Va. Jan. 8, 2016; filed Feb. 23, 2016, entered Feb. 24, 2016); see also United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-douglas-ca4-2016.