United States v. Douglas

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Douglas

455 F. App'x 360

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 23, 2011·No. No. 11-6862·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nigel Nicholas Douglas appeals the district court’s order dismissing what it construed as a duplicate of his initial 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2011) motion for sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Douglas, No. 2:93-cr-00131-[361]*361HCM-7 (E.D.Va. May 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nigel Nicholas Douglas appeals the district court’s order dismissing what it construed as a duplicate of his initial 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2011) motion for sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Douglas, No. 2:93-cr-00131-[361]*361HCM-7 (E.D.Va. May 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Douglas, 455 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

455 F. App'x 360 (United States v. Douglas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related