United States v. Douglas

623 F. App'x 535
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 1, 2015·No. No. 15-12294·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Conrad Kahn, appointed counsel for Willie James Douglas, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Douglas’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Douglas, 623 F. App'x 535 (11th Cir. 2015).

623 F. App'x 535 (United States v. Douglas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)