United States v. Dortch

203 F.3d 883, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1990, 2000 WL 162302
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2000·No. 98-41129·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before GARWOOD, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing is DENIED. In response to the petition for rehearing, however, the court acknowledges that the *884 evidence found at the residence is not necessarily to be excluded, given that there were independent sources of information that formed the basis of the search warrant for the house. Accordingly, the sentence indicating to the contrary is hereby deleted. See United States v. Dortch, 199 F.3d 193, 203 (5th Cir.1999).

Judge Garwood dissents from denial of rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dortch, 203 F.3d 883, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1990, 2000 WL 162302 (5th Cir. 2000).

203 F.3d 883 (United States v. Dortch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

William Windham v. Harris County, Texas
875 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Cortez
Fifth Circuit, 2008
United States v. Schlieve
Fifth Circuit, 2006
United States v. Furstonberg
Fifth Circuit, 2003
State v. Wiegand
645 N.W.2d 125 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2002)
United States v. Brooks
Fifth Circuit, 2002
United States v. Clark
Fifth Circuit, 2001
United States v. Johnson
Fifth Circuit, 2001