United States v. Dortch

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Dortch

203 F.3d 883, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1990, 2000 WL 162302

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 2000

Docket98-41129

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 203 F.3d 883 (United States v. Dortch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dortch, 203 F.3d 883, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1990, 2000 WL 162302 (5th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before GARWOOD, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing is DENIED. In response to the petition for rehearing, however, the court acknowledges that the *884 evidence found at the residence is not necessarily to be excluded, given that there were independent sources of information that formed the basis of the search warrant for the house. Accordingly, the sentence indicating to the contrary is hereby deleted. See United States v. Dortch, 199 F.3d 193, 203 (5th Cir.1999).

Judge Garwood dissents from denial of rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI