United States v. Dor

313 F. App'x 596
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2009·No. No. 08-6903·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jean Ronel Dor appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dor, No. 3:04-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W.Va. May 28, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.2009). We deny Dor’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dor, 313 F. App'x 596 (4th Cir. 2009).

313 F. App'x 596 (United States v. Dor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)