United States v. Donnell Benson
This text of United States v. Donnell Benson (United States v. Donnell Benson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6861
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DONNELL DEAN BENSON, a/k/a Dizzy
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:11-cr-00122-D-1)
Submitted: October 23, 2018 Decided: October 26, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donnell Dean Benson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Donnell Dean Benson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. See United States v. Muldrow, 844 F.3d 434, 437 (4th Cir. 2016)
(reviewing district court’s decision whether to reduce sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for
abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Donnell Benson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-donnell-benson-ca4-2018.