United States v. Don Stovall and Robert Harlon "Frosty" Winter

833 F.2d 526, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16167
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 24, 1987·No. 86-1453·Published·Cited by 23 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that references to the special assessment under 18 U.S.C. § 3013 appearing in the court’s opinion in this case are DELETED as irrelevant to the decision.

At the conclusion in Part III A of our opinion in this case, we indicated that Ray v. United States, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 2093, 95 L.Ed.2d 693 (1987), did not apply, and the concurrent sentence doctrine made it unnecessary to review the convictions on several of the counts. Our conclusion was that the $50 special assessment, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013, had not been ordered although mandated by that section. Government counsel has pointed out to us that § 3013 was enacted after the offenses charged in this case occurred. Therefore, *527 the special assessments called for in that section could not have been imposed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Don Stovall and Robert Harlon "Frosty" Winter, 833 F.2d 526, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16167 (5th Cir. 1987).

833 F.2d 526 (United States v. Don Stovall and Robert Harlon "Frosty" Winter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mark Garza, Jr.
708 F. App'x 209 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Randle Jackson, III
672 F. App'x 408 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
Jennings, Gary Don
Texas Supreme Court, 2015
United States v. Frenchitt Collins
774 F.3d 256 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. McCuiston
183 F. App'x 474 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Lerma
128 F. App'x 381 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Shunk
Fifth Circuit, 1997
United States v. Corona
Fifth Circuit, 1997
United States v. Hilliard
818 F. Supp. 309 (D. Colorado, 1993)
United States v. Dennard
812 F. Supp. 749 (E.D. Michigan, 1993)
United States v. Jon Harold Royal
972 F.2d 643 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
U.S. v. Royal
Fifth Circuit, 1992
United States v. Louis A. Arky
938 F.2d 579 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Vijay Parekh
926 F.2d 402 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Daniel K. Conners
894 F.2d 987 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Orlando Richard Velasquez
890 F.2d 717 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)