United States v. Randle Jackson, III

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 2017
Docket16-50496
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Randle Jackson, III (United States v. Randle Jackson, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Randle Jackson, III, (5th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Case: 16-50496 Document: 00513818699 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/03/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-50496 FILED Summary Calendar January 3, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RANDLE JACKSON, III,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:14-CR-240-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Randle Jackson, III, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jackson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 16-50496 Document: 00513818699 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/03/2017

No. 16-50496

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Randle Jackson, III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-randle-jackson-iii-ca5-2017.