United States v. Dodson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2019·No. 19-3098·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT August 14, 2019 _________________________________ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. No. 19-3098 (D.C. No. 2:18-CR-20048-DDC-1) ALLEN DODSON, (D. Kan.)

Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* _________________________________

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _________________________________

This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not

materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);

10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This matter comes on for consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion for

Summary Disposition. Upon consideration thereof, the motion is granted and the

district court’s judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted, following the entry of a conditional guilty plea,

of failure to register as a sex offender, in violation of the Sex Offender Registration

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2250. He was sentenced to 10 months’

incarceration plus five years of supervised release.

On appeal, the only argument the defendant presents is that application of

SORNA to him, a pre-act offender, violates the nondelegation doctrine. This court

has rejected that argument in United States v. Nichols, 775 F.3d 1225, 1230-31 (10th

Cir. 2014), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. Nichols v. United States, 136 S.Ct. 1113

(2016). See also Gundy v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 2116 (2019).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The mandate

shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dodson, (10th Cir. 2019).

United States v. Dodson (United States v. Dodson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Nichols
775 F.3d 1225 (Tenth Circuit, 2014)
Nichols v. United States
578 U.S. 104 (Supreme Court, 2016)
Gundy v. United States
588 U.S. 128 (Supreme Court, 2019)