United States v. Dodd
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7105
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOSEPH RICKY DODD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:96-cr-00153-HCM-2)
Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 22, 2008
Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Ricky Dodd, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Joseph Ricky Dodd appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Dodd, No. 2:96-cr-00153-HCM-2
(E.D. Va. filed May 21, 2008; entered May 23, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Dodd (United States v. Dodd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.