United States v. Dixon
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Omar Jermel Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find ho reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dixon, No. 3:02-cr-00209-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
669 F. App'x 646 (United States v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.