United States v. Dixon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6558

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RICHARD L. DIXON, a/k/a E, a/k/a Earl,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:96-cr-00191-1)

Submitted: September 15, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard L. Dixon, for Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard L. Dixon appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence

reduction, as well as its order denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

orders. United States v. Dixon, No. 2:96-cr-00191-1 (S.D.W. Va.

filed June 29, 2009 & entered June 30, 2009; Mar. 16, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED