United States v. Dioguardi

Second Circuit

United States v. Dioguardi

237 F.2d 57

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedSeptember 27, 1956

DocketDocket 24318

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 237 F.2d 57 (United States v. Dioguardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dioguardi, 237 F.2d 57 (2d Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the showing before us and having in mind the circumstances stated in F.R.Cr.P. 46(c), 18 U.S.C., as determining the amount of bail which “will insure the presence of the defendant,” we do not feel justified at this time in interfering with the discretion exercised by the district judges in refusing to reduce the bail for defendant pending trial heretofore fixed, particularly in view of the prospect of speedy trial, now set for October 15, 1956. The orders refusing to reduce the bail are therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the showing before us and having in mind the circumstances stated in F.R.Cr.P. 46(c), 18 U.S.C., as determining the amount of bail which “will insure the presence of the defendant,” we do not feel justified at this time in interfering with the discretion exercised by the district judges in refusing to reduce the bail for defendant pending trial heretofore fixed, particularly in view of the prospect of speedy trial, now set for October 15, 1956. The orders refusing to reduce the bail are therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 F.2d 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dioguardi-ca2-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack