United States v. Charles Tuso

237 F.2d 720
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 1956
Docket24327
StatusPublished

This text of 237 F.2d 720 (United States v. Charles Tuso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Charles Tuso, 237 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1956).

Opinion

237 F.2d 720

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles TUSO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 143.

Docket 24327.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued October 8, 1956.

Decided October 10, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; David N. Edelstein, Judge.

Goldstein & Goldstein, New York City (Gilbert Goldstein and Lawrence Kovalsky, New York City, of counsel) for appellant.

Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, New York City (Thomas B. Gilchrist, Jr., Chief Assistant, Arthur H. Christy, Chief, Criminal Division, New York City, and John A. Keeffe, Asst. U. S. Attys., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and HAND and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The court sees no distinction between this case and Dioguardi appeal, United States v. Dioguardi, 2 Cir., 237 F.2d 57.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dioguardi
237 F.2d 57 (Second Circuit, 1956)
United States v. Tuso
237 F.2d 720 (Second Circuit, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 F.2d 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-tuso-ca2-1956.