United States v. Charles Tuso
This text of 237 F.2d 720 (United States v. Charles Tuso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles TUSO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 143.
Docket 24327.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued October 8, 1956.
Decided October 10, 1956.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; David N. Edelstein, Judge.
Goldstein & Goldstein, New York City (Gilbert Goldstein and Lawrence Kovalsky, New York City, of counsel) for appellant.
Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, New York City (Thomas B. Gilchrist, Jr., Chief Assistant, Arthur H. Christy, Chief, Criminal Division, New York City, and John A. Keeffe, Asst. U. S. Attys., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and HAND and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The court sees no distinction between this case and Dioguardi appeal, United States v. Dioguardi, 2 Cir., 237 F.2d 57.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 F.2d 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-tuso-ca2-1956.