United States v. Dickens

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 23, 2009
• Docket: 08-7709
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7709

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

SHUANE ANTELLE DICKENS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:97-cr-00128-HCM-3)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oldric J. Labell, Jr., Newport News, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Robert J. Krask, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shuane Antelle Dickens appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Dickens, No. 2:97-cr-00128-HCM-3 (E.D. Va.

July 23, 2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247

(4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED