United States v. Diaz

331 F. App'x 306
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Diaz. Read the opinion of the Court — 344 F. App'x 36
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2009·No. 08-11208·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Bobby Ray Diaz presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). In addition, Diaz raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Avants, 278 F.3d 510, 522 (5th Cir.2002), which held that, although the appellant was in state custody and was represented by counsel, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel did not attach with respect to a federal charge for which the appellant had not yet been indicted. The Government’s motion for summary affir-mance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Diaz, 331 F. App'x 306 (5th Cir. 2009).

331 F. App'x 306 (United States v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Daugherty
264 F.3d 513 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Avants
278 F.3d 510 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)