United States v. Diaz

252 F. App'x 595
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Diaz. Read the opinion of the Court — 286 F. App'x 192
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2007·No. 07-10339·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jaime Vidales Diaz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California^ 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Vidales Diaz has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Vidales Diaz’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Vidales Diaz’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Aceording *596 ly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under tlie limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Diaz, 252 F. App'x 595 (5th Cir. 2007).

252 F. App'x 595 (United States v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Cantwell
470 F.3d 1087 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)